NATO Here We Come 🇫🇮 đź‡¸đź‡Ş

Finland and Sweden (those are their flags) have just requested entrance into NATO. If they do ultimately join, they will be the 31st and 32d members. Most of us know something about NATO, but how did it come about? Well, you really need to go all the way to the meeting at Yalta in February 1945.

Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin at Yalta, February 1945

At the meeting of the Big Three (Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin) the Soviet leader demanded, and the other men finally gave in, that at the end of the war, Poland would be under Soviet control. The Polish Government-in-Exile had worked side by side with the Allies, and had treaties with both Britain and France, but at that point, with Soviet tanks barreling through Poland on their way to Germany, there was little that the US or UK could do. However, neither Churchill not Roosevelt, and later Truman, were happy with the Soviet takeover. They were even more concerned with the way a Soviet-backed coup turned Czechoslovakia into a communist underling, and how the USSR set up the Berlin Blockade. Western European states feared that the Soviets would try to take over more nations that were still on their knees after the war. So in 1947, the United Kingdom and France signed a defensive pact known as the Treaty of Dunkirk.

President Harry S. Truman signing the NATO treaty

The Benelux countries–Belgium, The Netherlands, and Luxembourg–are small nations and, concerned with possible Soviet inroads, wanted additional military support from other major nations. On March 17, 1948, they joined with Britain and France and signed the Treaty of Brussels, which was a mutual defense pact which would last for fifty years. That was an excellent first step, but as most of Eastern Europe remained under the control of the Soviet Bloc, many in the West felt that they ultimately needed to work together with the US to stand up to Stalin.

After another year of consultations, the US signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization–NATO. In addition to the UK, France and the Benelux countries, Canada, Italy, Portugal, Denmark and Iceland joined the Organization. Greece and Turkey joined in 1952, and West Germany did so in 1955. So, during the peak of the Cold War, NATO faced the Warsaw Pact. Spain became a member of NATO in 1982. But it wasn’t until the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991 that former members of the Warsaw Pact joined NATO. The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland joined in 1999. Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia entered in 2004. NATO accepted Albania and Croatia in 2009 while Montenegro joined in 2017 and North Macedonia in 2020.

Shortly after the fall of the USSR, it seemed to be possible that the West and Russia would be able to work well. But with Mr. Putin’s attacks in Georgia, Chechnya, and early forays into Ukraine, it’s no wonder that Sweden and Finland, both of whom had fought Russia to a stalemates in the past, would want to join an organization that could stand up against possible aggressions to come from Russia.

Dereliction of Duty

This is my 100th post, and I had planned to write something completely different. But things can change in the blink of an eye, so I hope you won’t mind my personal thoughts on what’s going on in Afghanistan as someone who grew up with Marines, and has been a military historian for 45 years.

First, let’s define the phrase “dereliction of duty.” Basically it’s either deliberately refusing to perform one’s duties, or being incapable on some level of performing his/her duties. If you want to read the specifics, take a look at Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. As Commander-in-Chief of the US military, the President of the United States is in charge of overseeing all diplomatic and military missions. My personal belief is that the President has been derelict in his duties in the drawdown in Afghanistan.

The problem is not whether or not we should leave Afghanistan. Presidents of both parties have wanted to leave, though keeping s small residual force to provide intelligence and avoiding a resurgence of al Qada. The problem is HOW we’re leaving. We are in the middle of an unmitigated disaster which the President brought on his country. Specifically, our military, our civilians in Afghanistan, the translators and other Afghanis who worked with the Americans, our NATO allies who fought (and died) alongside us. And the Afghan women and girls who have become doctors, nurses, journalists, teachers, lawyers etc., are now being send back into the Stone Age. (And if that weren’t bad enough, in the cut-and run orders, we left billions of dollars in in weapons from bullets to night vision goggles, to helicopters.) He received numerous intelligence estimates for months., and much the same from high-ranking officers in both the Pentagon and State Department.

He was tole that if he wished to draw down from Afghanistan, there’s a reasonable way to do so. You quietly start taking out our civilians first. Then you quietly start taking out the Afghanis and their families who worked with us. You make sure that our allies are getting their people out, then the few remaining embassy personnel. Only then does our military leave.

Instead the C-in-C has left tens of thousands of people stuck in Kabul and other parts of the country. The military was ordered to leave immediately–including Bagram Air Base–the safest and fastest airport to use. Then, when it became clear that the Taliban were in charge, the State Department told the Americans and Afghan partners to get to the Hamid Karzai Airport in Kabul. Of course, they would have to get through Taliban check-points and through the gates which are help by the Taliban. This entire debacle has little to do with military options. The decision was made for purely political reasons–and even that isn’t working out the way it was expected.

If you don’t believe me, ask a friend who’s spent time in the military. I did an informal pole this morning with several of them–including a Marine who’s been a second lieutenant for all of two months–and every one said that this drawdown was an obvious disaster from the beginning. Or take a look at the Wall Street Journal or The Washington Post or the Examiner. You can look at Reuters or the AP or the Daily Mail online. Maybe watch some of the discussions in the British Parliament on Wednesday evening. Go online and listen to what Emmanuel Macron of France, Angela Merke of Germanyl, or even Prime Minister Draghi of Italy. It’s the same everywhere.

Think about Wake Island. Chosin Reservoir. The burning of the Capital during the War of 1812. Americans have lost many times. But we have never run away. No president has ordered our men to leave. And that’s why I believe that he had been derelict in his duty, and should resign.

Hamid Karzai Airport’s commercial terminal